Guinevere
Dec 20 2010, 07:44 PM
How come everybody says that RMXP is better than RMVX? I mean, Isn't RMVX easier to use with better graphics? I mean, what does each have over the other?
The Angel of Death
Dec 20 2010, 08:04 PM
VX FTW!
VX is Easier to Script with.
VX is Easier to Do Graphics for.
VX is Easier to Do Events for(In my Opinion).
Overall?
VX won.
Shocky
Dec 20 2010, 08:58 PM
You're judging the system based on which one is easier? That is a consideration, but honestly, in the end that has nothing to do with the engine. It has to do with your skills.
In my opinion, RMXP is better simply because you can do more with it. Yes, the RTP isn't that great. But there are so many more possibiltiies with it, whereas all you see with VX is Famitsu-generated sprites and old j-RPG style mapping. There's nothing wrong with that, it's just a limited engine.
heisenman
Dec 20 2010, 09:16 PM
QUOTE
all you see with VX is Famitsu-generated sprites and old j-RPG style mapping
This has nothing to do with the maker itself.
Also, VX can use XP graphics and vice versa, so this is a useless point to compare two engines based on their available graphical resources.
I'm under the impression this will be closed because it has probably been already discussed, but check this.
http://wiki.pockethouse.com/index.php?titl...vs_RPG_Maker_VX
Kread-EX
Dec 21 2010, 02:48 AM
Like heisenmann said, this is asked waaaay too often.