Submit Your Article


 
RPG Maker

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


  Games Resources RPG Maker VX RPG Maker XP Scripts Tutorials Downloads

> Battle System for upcoming RP, Accepting suggestions too.
Battle System choosing
What system do you prefer?
"Rock, paper, scissors" system [ 2 ] ** [33.33%]
Tactical Stance system [ 3 ] ** [50.00%]
Other? (Post it!) [ 1 ] ** [16.67%]
Total Votes: 7
  
Nicsp
post Jul 9 2011, 11:44 AM
Post #1


BUT I WANT TO HELP.
Group Icon

Group: Revolutionary
Posts: 1,737
Type: None
RM Skill: Advanced
Rev Points: 10




So, as some of you may know, i'm currently working in a simple action-based RP which will, hopefully, attract new people here to these subforums. Now there's a problem, because of the nature of this RP, there will, no doubt, be many battles. And since the point of this RP is to attract new members, not only the usual text battling way could be a bit of a disadvantage for new RPers but also would require a certain distancing from the author to it's character since, as we all know, no one likes losing.

I have discussed what battle system should be used with Sparrowsmith via PM for a while and we came up with two options to choose from, one being very simple but requiring the need of one or more admins of the RP to be frequently present to handle the battles and the other one a lot more simple but also very complex. Needless to say, we are also accepting suggestions, if any of you have any.

"Rock, paper, scissors" system by Nicsp.

Clicky.
QUOTE
Instead of making up their own weapons, the GM will make a list of avaible weapons and assign to these weapons ten points through three different "stats", that data will only be avaible to the GM and to the player who owns the weapons, and then when two people fight, we have them choose what stat they want to use to battle the opponent, the stat is then PMed to the GM who will then reply to both people saying which is the winner. Each of these stats "beats" each other (Think rock, paper, scissors.), and when that happens, the "winning" stat gets a 2x value bonus over the other one.

So...By example...

Bob has...A shield.
Block: 5
Charge: 4
Strike: 1

John has...A chainsaw sword.
Block: 3
Charge: 3
Strike: 4

Block>Charge>Strike>Block

Bob uses block and John uses Strike.
Bob: 5
John: 4

But since Strike>Block then...

Bob: 5
John: 8

John wins.

Now on another occasion:

Both John and Bob use charge.

Bob: 4
John: 3

Since charge=charge then Bob wins.

After the result has been calculated by the GM and sent back to both of the RPers involved in the battle, it will be up to the RPers to now RP the battle as they see fit, keeping in mind which of the two has to win.


Tactical Stance system by Sparrowsmith

Click here!
QUOTE
An RP fight needs to go on as long as is necessary for entertainments sake, but as short as is possible for story development. One idea would be 'stances'.
In each post you can either change your 'stance' or attack, but not both. The three stances are offensive, defensive, and moving. If you're defensive, you can't be hit or hit, if you're offensive, then you can hit and be hit. Moving is for any REAL movement (of course you can move while attacking or defending) moving is for positioning that would take time (such as an archer getting to a good distance for firing).
This would still be difficult to do, but would create a real sense of a battle field...


So, these are the two options we have at the moment. Opinions and suggestions?


__________________________


"I may not agree with what you say, but i will fight to the death for your right to say it." -Voltaire

YOU. YES YOU, DO YOU LIKE ROLEPLAYING? DID YOU KNOW RRR HAS IT'S OWN ROLEPLAYING FORUMS? DO YOU KNOW IT'S QUITE AWESOME? YOU SHOULD JOIN! YES, THIS IS SHAMELESS ADVERTISING. NOW CLICK THIS LINK.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
   
 
Start new topic
Replies
Sparrowsmith
post Jul 11 2011, 03:27 PM
Post #2


ROROW was here, went for beer
Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 4,600
Type: Writer
RM Skill: Intermediate
Rev Points: 5




There are still a fair few flaws with the stance system though.
For example:
2 players start in defensive. Whichever changes to offensive first leaves themselves vulnerable, so there's no reason to change.
Like wise, once one does attack (let's say an archer) then the other player will run after them. The archer will then either go defensive or run away. We eventually get a kind of cycling system.

Unless we mix the two together?
offensive vs defensive = no hit either side.
moving (charging) vs defensive = damage done to defensive.
offensive vs moving (charging) = damage done to moving.
moving (dodging) vs offensive = offensive misses

after a dodge both parties change to defensive
two identical attacking stances lead to damage on both sides.


if you HAVE to change your stance every turn, then this could lead to some interesting fights (stances carry from one turn to the next)
1 - offensive
2 - defensive (no damage)
1 - charging (damage done to 2)
2 - offensive (damage done to 1)
1 - offensive (damage done to both)
2 - dodging (stances reset to defensive)
1 - charging (damage done to 2)
etc

and the fight would be written like the following: (I'll do a draft, and assume they have swords and shields)
"1 leads with an attack, bringing his sword crashing towards 2. 2 quickly brings his shield upwards to parry the attack. 1 wastes not time tackling 2 to the ground while his shield is raised. 2 picks himself up and brings his sword against 1's side. 1 counters by bringing his sword around and scraping 2 as 2's blade slides deeper into his side. 2 rolls backwards out of the way of the attack. 1 quickly follows, tackling him to the ground"
and that's a very basic draft. It's sort of like a mixture between stances and rock paper scissors, but without the numbers and with a lot more combinations.
It's complex, so probably wouldn't hold well, but would otherwise have potential I think.


__________________________
Warning! this post may contain sarcasm, please re-read it in a funny voice
The old spoiler was out of control, it had to be stopped.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
   

Posts in this topic
- Nicsp   Battle System for upcoming RP   Jul 9 2011, 11:44 AM
- - Ryuga   Both have there pros and cons, but I think the tac...   Jul 9 2011, 02:10 PM
- - Nicsp   QUOTE (Ryuga @ Jul 9 2011, 07:10 PM) Both...   Jul 9 2011, 04:04 PM
- - Ryuga   QUOTE (Nicsp @ Jul 9 2011, 06:04 PM) Thin...   Jul 11 2011, 12:19 PM
- - Ryuga   QUOTE (Sparrowsmith @ Jul 11 2011, 05:27 ...   Jul 11 2011, 03:46 PM
- - Nicsp   It took me a few reads to understand it throughly ...   Jul 12 2011, 01:15 PM
- - Sparrowsmith   HP of some kind would be essential. Perhaps use Te...   Jul 13 2011, 02:49 AM
- - Nicsp   (To the people who're confused, Telum is the n...   Jul 13 2011, 06:33 AM
- - Spirit_Master_X   There was a fighting technique we use to play arou...   Jul 13 2011, 07:27 AM
- - Nicsp   QUOTE (Spirit_Master_X @ Jul 13 2011, 12...   Jul 13 2011, 08:17 AM
- - Spirit_Master_X   We could combine the principles of T1 and the tact...   Jul 13 2011, 08:20 AM
- - Nicsp   QUOTE (Spirit_Master_X @ Jul 13 2011, 01...   Jul 13 2011, 09:18 AM
- - Ryuga   QUOTE (Spirit_Master_X @ Jul 13 2011, 09...   Jul 13 2011, 09:41 AM
- - Sparrowsmith   Spirit, I can see reading the T1 that I violated a...   Jul 13 2011, 02:39 PM
- - Ryuga   I have a few problems with the system Sparrow. I ...   Jul 13 2011, 03:58 PM
- - Sparrowsmith   Yeah, I got carried away. We'll cut out the mo...   Jul 14 2011, 09:00 AM
- - Ryuga   It took a few reads to understand what you were sa...   Jul 14 2011, 11:39 AM
- - Sparrowsmith   You make a good point. I put parry up because they...   Jul 16 2011, 09:05 AM
- - Ryuga   The problem with the system is that you can't ...   Jul 16 2011, 09:21 AM
- - Sparrowsmith   I couldn't let someone else make the chart, I...   Jul 16 2011, 01:07 PM
- - Ryuga   Seems like alot, but then again, I can't reall...   Jul 16 2011, 09:54 PM
- - Sparrowsmith   PM me your first move (we'll keep it simple, j...   Jul 17 2011, 03:43 AM
- - Sparrowsmith   if still needed: [Show/Hide] Battle System 2.0 ...   Aug 6 2011, 01:27 PM
- - Nicsp   Amazing work. I will gladly test it, I'll pm y...   Aug 6 2011, 02:16 PM
- - Sparrowsmith   Don't praise me yet, we have to see how it wor...   Aug 6 2011, 05:01 PM
- - Moonpearl   Just stumbling over the topic and didn't take ...   Aug 7 2011, 01:43 AM
- - Sparrowsmith   The problem with rock paper scissors (or any varia...   Aug 7 2011, 02:14 AM


Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 10:54 PM
RPG RPG Revolution is an Privacy Policy and Legal
eXTReMe Tracker